Press Release

on the results of the General Assembly of MHC 

 

The General Assembly (GA) of MHC took place on June 30th, 2006, within the headquarters of the MHC. 

According to the Agenda of the GA, the beginning of it should had been started at 9.30 AM, still already at 8.45 the majority of the MHC members were present at the GA, therefore the interest for it was very strong. The meeting was held in contradictory discussions, sometimes even with very aggressive attitude of some participants. The GA was adjourned at 7.45 PM.  

Present at the GA were 27 members of those 32, and 5 guests invited. 

The GA was leaded by the member of the Executive Council, the director of the high-school  „Lucian Blaga” from Tiraspol city, Mr. Ion Iovcev, whose mission was successful accomplished, taking into consideration the difficult moments within the GA.  

The GA approved the Report of the Executive Council and the Financial Report for the period 2004 – 2005, same as the extraordinary situation of the MHC within the last 7 months (slanderery statements of certain persons, denial of donors and partners for collaboration with MHC, whereas MHC was forced to close one of the most specific activities of it - Legal Aid Clinic). 

Even though there were made 9 audit controls within two years, all of its, except one[1], confirmed the credibility of financial reports of MHC. Therefore the GA elaborated several recommendations in order to improve the management of MHC, to improve the transparency and to convince the society and the donors that the finances are correctly and efficiently administrated. The most important recommendations are the following:  

1.  Statute and structure modification of MHC. There was introduced new functions: of Executive Director, who previously was called Vice-chair of MHC; same as of Financial Director function. Both of the functions will be subordinated to the new Council of Administration, which previously was called Executive Council, and both will be publicly announced.  

  1. To finalise „Internal Proceedings Rules” and to be offered for approval by the Council of Administration, no later than October, 30th, 2006. 

 

  1. To organise debates in order to adapt and approve the Code of Ethics, proceeding from the Code of Ethics and Conduct of NGOs, published on the website: www.wango.org.

 

  1. The Council of Administration once elaborating and implementing the organisational measures and activities, it will take into consideration all the recommendations of the GA (according to the new Statute of MHC).

 

  1. The GA elected board bodies for the next two years, in number of 7 persons, as it follows:  

 

 

No

Name, Surname

Scietific title, function  

Place of work  

Voted from 25 + alternatives[2]

1.

Stefan Uritu

PhD in Physics, associate professor   

State University of Tiraspol in Chisinau   

22+1

2.

Ilie Nasu

PhD in Pedagogy, associate professor

University „Aleco Russo” in Balti city

20+1

3.

Ana Golubenco

Director

Independent television station „TV-Elita”, in Rezina city

20+5

4.

Teodor Carnat

PhD in Law,  associate professor

Moldova State University 

19+4

5.

Ion Iovcev

Director

High-school „Lucian Blaga” in Tiraspol

16+4

6.

Natalia Mardari

Lawyer

Individual Bureau of Lawyers  „LEX PHOENEX”

15+6

7.

Vitalie Scutelnic

Manager

SRL "DANICOM"

13+4

 

  

Moreover, there was elected President of the Council of Administration, who is and President of MHC, according to the new Statute of MHC. Accordingly, 5 votes were for, 1 against and 1 withhold, for Mr. Stefan Uritu.   

6. Censor Commission is formed of 3 persons.   

Undersigned,

 

1. Stefan Uritu,         

 

2.  Ilie Nasu              

 

3.  Ana Golubenco   

 

4. Teodor Carnat       

 

5.  Ion Iovcev            

 

6.  Natalia Mardari  

 

7. Vitalie Scutelnic    

 

 

[1] The audit control made by the company  “Ernst & Young”, from 6 to 9 of December 2005, which includes serious fact errors, and which leaded to slanderery

 statements towards MHC and the chane reaction of the donors and partners of MHC. 

 

[2] The first number shows how many people voted for „the quality of member of Council of Administration”, the second sumber - for „the quality of alternative member of Council of Administration”, for example 14+5 - mean that for the person X,  14 votes given for the quality of member of the Council of Administration, and 5 for the alternative member quality, therefore 25(total number of participants) – (14+5) = 6 (votes who didn't want this person as member of Council of Administration).